BPSC 131
INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL THEORY
IGNOU BPSC 131 Solved Free Assignment
BPSC 131 Solved Free Assignment July 2024 & January 2025
Assignment – I
Q 1. What is Politics? Explain.
Ans. Politics is a part of our everyday life, even if we do not always notice it. It is the way people make decisions in groups, especially about how a country or society should be run.
At its heart, politics is about power—who has it, how they use it, and for whose benefit.
It deals with the rules and laws that affect everyone, the government that enforces them, and the people who choose or challenge those in power.
Whether it is about voting in elections, making laws, protesting injustice, or even talking about social issues, all of these things are part of politics.
Politics is important because it shapes the society we live in. It decides who gets what, when, and how.
For example, when a government decides to spend money on schools instead of military weapons, that is a political decision.
When a law is made to protect the environment or to help the poor, it is also politics.
These decisions affect millions of lives, and that is why politics matters to every person, even if they are not directly involved in it.
It decides the future of a nation and the opportunities people will have in their lives.
In simple terms, politics is about governance. It is the process of choosing leaders, making policies, and ensuring justice and order in society.
In a democratic country like India, politics allows people to choose their representatives through voting. These elected leaders then form the government and make laws on behalf of the people.
Politics in a democracy gives power to the common people, allowing them to express their needs, raise their voices, and hold leaders accountable.
This system gives citizens the right to participate, ask questions, and bring change through peaceful methods.
However, politics is not just about elections or political parties.
It also includes movements, discussions, and decisions at different levels—like schools, offices, or local communities.
When students protest against unfair fees or people come together to demand better roads or clean water, that is also politics.
It is about raising voices, negotiating power, and making decisions that affect a group of people. So, politics exists not only in parliaments and assemblies but also in daily life.
Politics has both positive and negative sides. On the positive side, it gives a voice to the people.
It helps in solving problems, building infrastructure, maintaining law and order, and protecting rights.
A good political system promotes justice, equality, and freedom. But when politics is misused, it can lead to corruption, division, and injustice.
Sometimes leaders focus more on their personal gains than the welfare of the people. Dirty politics, vote-bank politics, and power struggles can damage the trust people have in the system.
Education about politics is important so that people can make wise decisions.
When citizens are aware and active, politics becomes a tool for progress. But if people ignore politics, bad leaders can take advantage.
That is why every citizen, especially the youth, should understand the political system, know their rights and duties, and take part in the democratic process.
Even small actions like voting, raising awareness, or joining community efforts can bring change.
Politics also plays a key role in international relations. Countries deal with each other through political decisions.
Trade agreements, peace talks, and global environmental action all happen through political discussion.
So, politics is not limited within the borders of one country; it connects the whole world. Leaders meet, debate, and decide on matters that affect not just their people, but the entire globe—like climate change, wars, and global health.
Q 2. Discuss the revival of political theory.
Ans. The revival of political theory is an important development in the field of political science that began around the mid-20th century.
For a long time, especially during the 1950s and 60s, political theory had lost its central place in the study of politics.
Scholars were focusing more on facts, data, and behavior, rather than ideas, values, and principles.
This approach, often called the “behavioural approach,” treated politics more like a science and focused on what is, rather than what ought to be.
It used statistics, surveys, and observation to study how people behaved politically, but in doing so, it began to ignore deeper moral and philosophical questions.
As a result, the human and ethical side of politics got pushed aside, and many people began to feel that political science was losing its soul.
This concern led to the revival of political theory, especially from the late 1960s onwards.
Scholars and thinkers began to realize that politics is not just about power, voting, or government structures—it is also about justice, equality, rights, and freedom.
These are issues that cannot be fully understood through numbers and data. They need deep thinking and reflection, which is the role of political theory.
So, many scholars started to bring back normative questions into political study—questions that ask what is right, what is fair, and what kind of society we should aim for.
One of the major thinkers who led this revival was John Rawls, whose book A Theory of Justice (1971) had a huge impact.
Rawls tried to define what a just society would look like and introduced new ways of thinking about fairness and equality.
His ideas gave new life to political theory by showing that deep philosophical thinking was still relevant and necessary in modern politics.
Around the same time, other thinkers like Robert Nozick, Michael Sandel, and Charles Taylor also contributed to this revival by offering different views on liberty, identity, and the role of the state.
These debates enriched political theory and brought it back into focus.
This revival also made political theory more inclusive and diverse.
Earlier, most political theories were based on Western ideas and experiences. But during the revival, thinkers from different regions, backgrounds, and identities started raising their voices.
Feminist political theory questioned the male-dominated nature of politics and argued for equal rights and representation for women.
Post-colonial thinkers questioned the Eurocentric nature of political theory and brought in the experiences and struggles of countries like India, Africa, and Latin America.
The environmental movement also brought new ideas into political theory by raising questions about sustainability, rights of nature, and the future of the planet.
Another important aspect of the revival was that it made political theory more connected to real life. Earlier, it was often seen as abstract and far removed from common people’s issues.
But the revived political theory started to address current challenges like poverty, inequality, communalism, human rights, and global justice.
It was no longer just about reading old texts or studying past thinkers—it became a living subject, engaged with present-day problems.
Political theory now became a way to understand, question, and improve the world around us.
In countries like India, the revival of political theory had its own flavor. Indian scholars like Rajeev Bhargava, Partha Chatterjee, and Ashis Nandy brought Indian experiences into the discussion.
They questioned Western models of secularism, democracy, and development and tried to reframe these ideas in the Indian context.
They also brought in ideas from Indian philosophy, culture, and social movements, making political theory more rooted and meaningful for Indian society.
Assignment – II
Q 1. Examine Isaiah Berlin’s two concepts of Liberty.
Ans. Isaiah Berlin was a famous political thinker of the 20th century who made a deep impact on how we understand the idea of liberty or freedom.
In his famous lecture “Two Concepts of Liberty” delivered in 1958, Berlin explained that liberty is not just one idea but has two main forms—negative liberty and positive liberty.
These two forms help us understand how freedom works in different societies and how it can be protected or misused.
The first concept is negative liberty. This means the absence of interference from others, especially from the government or authority.
In simple words, it is the freedom to do what one wants without being stopped, as long as it does not harm others.
For example, if a person wants to speak freely, travel anywhere, or choose their religion, they should be allowed to do so without fear or control.
Negative liberty is mostly about protecting the individual’s private space from being invaded by others.
It focuses on non-interference and is supported by laws and rights that protect people from unnecessary control.
Berlin believed this kind of liberty was very important in a democratic society because it helped people live their lives with dignity and freedom.
The second concept is positive liberty. This means the freedom to control one’s own life and make one’s own decisions.
It is about being your own master rather than being controlled by outside forces, or even by your own inner weaknesses like fear, ignorance, or poverty.
Positive liberty is not just about being left alone—it is about being able to achieve your full potential and live the life you truly want.
For example, a poor person might not be able to enjoy negative liberty fully because they do not have the means to do what they want.
In such cases, positive liberty would mean giving them education, healthcare, or job opportunities so they can really be free. So, positive liberty is more about empowerment and self-realization.
However, Berlin warned that positive liberty can be dangerous if it is misused. Sometimes, rulers or governments use the idea of “making people free” as an excuse to control them.
They may say, “We know what is good for you,” and then take away people’s freedom in the name of helping them.
This has happened in many totalitarian regimes where freedom was taken away for the so-called “greater good.”
So, Berlin stressed that while both types of liberty are important, we must be very careful when dealing with positive liberty.
Q 2. Discuss some arguments against equality.
Ans. Equality is one of the most important ideas in modern political and social thought.
It means that every person should be treated fairly, without discrimination based on caste, gender, religion, race, or economic status.
While many people believe that equality is essential for justice and social progress, there are also several arguments made against complete or absolute equality.
These arguments do not always reject the idea of fairness, but they point out that treating everyone exactly the same might not always lead to the best or most just outcomes. Let us look at some of the main arguments against equality.
One of the first arguments is based on the idea of natural differences. People are not all the same by nature.
They differ in their talents, abilities, intelligence, and hard work. Some are born stronger, smarter, or more talented than others.
Supporters of this view argue that if people are unequal in their efforts and skills, then it is natural for the results they get—like wealth, success, or status—to be unequal too.
Trying to make everyone equal in the end may ignore the differences that naturally exist among people.
Forcing equality in such cases could feel unfair to those who have worked harder or achieved more on their own merit.
Another argument comes from the idea of freedom. Critics say that in trying to make everyone equal, governments may have to interfere too much in people’s personal lives or choices.
For example, if a person earns more money and wants to give it to their children, stopping them from doing so in the name of equality may be seen as a restriction of personal freedom.
So, some argue that too much focus on equality can limit individual liberty.
They believe people should be free to achieve as much as they can and enjoy the rewards of their efforts, even if it leads to inequality.
There is also an economic argument against absolute equality. Some people believe that inequality motivates people to work harder and be more innovative.
If everyone received the same reward no matter how hard they worked, there would be no reason to try harder or take risks.
According to this view, a certain level of inequality is necessary to keep society moving forward.
It encourages competition, which can lead to growth, progress, and development. Too much equality, on the other hand, might make people lazy or dependent on the state.
Another argument is about efficiency and practicality.
Trying to make everyone equal in every way is extremely difficult and may not even be possible. Resources like money, land, or opportunities are limited.
Giving the same share to everyone without considering their specific needs or situations can lead to wastage or misuse.
Critics say that instead of aiming for full equality, we should focus on providing equal opportunities and removing barriers so that everyone has a fair chance.
Q 3. Elaborate upon Distributive Justice.
Ans. Distributive justice is a concept that deals with the fair and just distribution of resources, wealth, opportunities, and responsibilities in a society.
It focuses on how things like money, education, healthcare, jobs, and other goods should be shared among people.
The main question distributive justice tries to answer is: “Who gets what, and why?” It is based on the belief that a good society is one where all people get their fair share and no one is left behind because of their background, gender, caste, religion, or social class.
This idea has been discussed by many philosophers and political thinkers over the years, and different people have different views about what is “fair.”
One of the earliest and most famous ideas comes from the philosopher Aristotle, who believed that justice means giving people what they deserve.
According to him, those who contribute more to society should receive more.
For example, a hardworking student might deserve a scholarship more than someone who doesn’t study. This way of thinking focuses on merit and contribution.
In modern times, many thinkers have expanded the idea of distributive justice. One of the most influential among them is John Rawls, an American philosopher.
In his book A Theory of Justice, Rawls suggested that a fair society is one in which everyone has equal basic rights and where inequalities are arranged in a way that helps the poorest or most disadvantaged people.
He introduced the idea of the “veil of ignorance,” where people imagine creating rules for society without knowing their own position—whether they would be rich or poor, male or female.
This thought experiment encourages fairness, because when people don’t know where they would end up in society, they are more likely to support rules that benefit everyone equally.
Another view is that of libertarians like Robert Nozick, who argue that justice is not about equal distribution, but about respecting people’s rights.
According to them, as long as someone earns their wealth fairly without stealing or cheating, they have the right to keep it—even if it creates inequality.
They believe that the role of the government should be limited, and that interfering too much in wealth distribution can reduce personal freedom.
There is also the socialist approach, which argues that the state should actively work to reduce economic inequality.
According to this view, wealth and resources should be distributed more equally, so that everyone can have a decent standard of living.
This idea supports policies like free education, free healthcare, minimum wages, and public welfare schemes that help the poor and underprivileged.
Distributive justice is especially important in countries like India, where there are huge gaps between the rich and the poor.
Caste-based discrimination, unequal access to education, and poverty are major issues.
In such cases, justice is not just about laws, but also about making sure people have real access to opportunities and basic needs.
Government schemes like reservation in jobs and education, free ration distribution, and rural employment programs aim to bring more justice in society.
Assignment – III
Q 1. Nature of Rights
Ans. Rights are basic freedoms or entitlements that every person should enjoy in a society. They are important because they protect human dignity and help people live a free and respectful life.
Rights are like shields that protect individuals from unfair treatment by the government, powerful groups, or even society.
The nature of rights is such that they are universal, equal, and essential for all human beings.
This means that no matter where you live or who you are, you deserve to have certain rights simply because you are a human being.
One of the most important features of rights is that they are universal. This means everyone should have them—whether rich or poor, man or woman, from any religion, caste, or background.
They are not based on a person’s social or economic status. For example, the right to life, right to education, and right to freedom of speech should be available to all.
Secondly, rights are inalienable, which means they cannot be taken away easily.
Even the government cannot take away someone’s rights without a very strong reason and a proper legal process.
Another feature of rights is that they are necessary for the development of individuals.
Without rights, people cannot express themselves, participate in public life, or improve their living conditions. Rights also have a moral and legal nature.
They are often supported by moral values and are also protected by the law. For example, in India, fundamental rights are guaranteed by the Constitution, and if someone’s rights are violated, they can go to court.
Rights are also related to duties. While enjoying rights, people must also respect the rights of others and follow the law.
For instance, one person’s right to freedom of speech should not harm another person’s right to dignity or peace.
Therefore, rights and duties go hand in hand. Rights are not unlimited; they come with reasonable restrictions.
Q 2. Pluralist Democracy
Ans. Pluralist democracy is a model of democracy that emphasizes diversity and the active role of various groups in politics.
In a pluralist democracy, power is not held by a single group or elite, but is shared among many different organizations, associations, and institutions.
These can include political parties, trade unions, business associations, religious groups, and civil society organizations.
The idea is that democracy becomes stronger when many voices are heard and different interests are balanced.
One of the key features of pluralist democracy is decentralization of power. It does not allow any single group to dominate decision-making.
Instead, different groups compete and cooperate to influence policies. This kind of system encourages negotiation, dialogue, and compromise.
For example, a law about education may involve inputs from teachers’ unions, parents’ associations, religious bodies, and political parties.
All of these groups have different views, and the final decision reflects a mix of those interests.
Pluralist democracy also promotes participation. It encourages people to join associations, attend meetings, and raise their voices through different platforms.
Unlike a majoritarian system where only the majority view counts, pluralism gives importance to minorities and small groups as well.
It tries to make sure that even weaker sections of society have a chance to be heard.
However, pluralist democracy also faces some criticisms. One common concern is that not all groups have equal power or resources.
Richer or more organized groups may have more influence, while poor or marginalized groups may struggle to make their voices heard.
For example, big business lobbies might influence government policy more than farmers’ unions. This can lead to unequal outcomes.
Still, pluralism remains a more inclusive form of democracy compared to systems where power is centralized or controlled by only a few.
Q 3. Gender
Ans. Gender refers to the social and cultural roles, behaviors, and expectations that society attaches to being male or female.
Unlike biological sex, which is about physical differences, gender is about how people are expected to behave based on their identity.
Gender shapes how people see themselves and how others treat them.
Unfortunately, for many years, gender roles have led to inequality, especially for women and gender minorities.
Traditionally, society has placed men in public roles like earning money, working in offices, or holding political power, while women were expected to take care of the home, children, and family.
This division created a gender hierarchy where men were seen as stronger or more capable than women.
As a result, women were denied equal rights, education, jobs, and political representation. Even today, despite many improvements, gender inequality continues in many parts of the world, including India.
The concept of gender also affects how people think about issues like clothing, behavior, or career choices. Boys are often told to be strong and avoid showing emotion, while girls are told to be gentle and quiet.
These stereotypes are harmful because they limit personal growth and freedom.
Feminist thinkers have played a big role in questioning these fixed roles and demanding equal rights for all genders.
Modern discussions on gender also include people who identify as transgender, non-binary, or gender-fluid.
These identities challenge the idea that there are only two genders. Recognizing and respecting these identities is important for building an inclusive society.
Q 4. Libertarian Theory
Ans. Libertarian theory is a political philosophy that strongly supports individual freedom, limited government, and private property.
According to libertarians, the best society is one where people are free to make their own choices without interference from the state, as long as they don’t harm others.
They believe in maximum personal liberty and minimum government control.
One of the central ideas of libertarian theory is the right to own property. Libertarians argue that people have a natural right to the fruits of their labor.
If someone works hard and earns money, they should have full control over how they use it.
The state should not take it away in the form of high taxes or redistribute it to others.
This is why libertarians often oppose welfare programs or social policies that take money from some to help others, even if the goal is fairness. They see such actions as violations of personal liberty.
Another key idea is self-ownership. Libertarians believe that each person owns their own body and mind.
Therefore, they should have full freedom to live the way they want, choose their lifestyle, and make their own decisions.
The role of the government should be only to protect people from violence, theft, or fraud—not to interfere in their private lives.
Famous libertarian thinkers include Robert Nozick, who wrote Anarchy, State, and Utopia.
He argued that any forced redistribution of wealth by the state is unjust, even if it aims to create equality. Instead, justice comes from respecting individual rights and free-market exchanges.
Critics of libertarianism argue that it ignores social realities like poverty, discrimination, and unequal starting points in life.
They say that without some government help, many people cannot enjoy true freedom because they lack the basic resources to live with dignity.
However, libertarians respond that too much government control leads to the loss of personal freedom and creates dependency.
Q 5. Civil Society
Ans. Civil society refers to the space in society where people come together to express their interests, exchange ideas, and take action for the common good—without being controlled by the government.
It includes non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community groups, religious associations, student unions, environmental groups, and even protest movements.
Civil society plays a vital role in making democracy deeper and more meaningful.
One of the key functions of civil society is to act as a bridge between the people and the government.
When people face problems like corruption, inequality, or poor services, they often turn to civil society groups for help.
These groups raise awareness, organize campaigns, and put pressure on authorities to bring change.
For example, the Right to Information (RTI) movement in India was largely driven by civil society groups and led to a powerful law that helps people fight corruption.
Civil society also promotes active citizenship. It encourages people to get involved in issues that matter—like education, health, environment, and justice.
It gives citizens a voice and helps build trust among different sections of society.
In a large and diverse country like India, civil society plays a key role in uniting people and promoting values like tolerance, cooperation, and social justice.
However, civil society is not without challenges. Sometimes, powerful groups or foreign interests may misuse NGOs or social platforms to push their own agenda.
Governments may also see civil society as a threat and try to control or silence it. Despite these issues, civil society remains an essential part of a healthy democracy.
IGNOU BPSC 132 Solved Free Assignment